• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Cwtch. XMPP. Matrix. SimpleX. Quiet. Delta Chat. Arcane Chat. Revolt. Briar. Meshtastic. etc. etc. etc.

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Aren’t most of those requiring dedicated setup? How does that work without a pre-existing communication channel such as email to prep for them? You walk to every party you need to integrate?

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Sorry, I don’t understand the words you’re using. Some of them are peer to peer. Some of them use servers which can be hosted by individuals. Some of them work locally over Bluetooth or WiFi.

        • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Damn. They didn’t seem so wild especially compared to the flow of yours. All mediums / techs you listed are complex technologies that take efforts to setup. Compared to the ubiquitousness of email. How do you propose to make that as available to the baseline human being?

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Email is much more difficult to configure than most of these services. Some of them require no configuration at all. You just open the app, type in the recipient’s address, and Bob’s your uncle.

            For others, it’s already available through community projects like AdminForge and Disroot.

            • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Users don’t need to configure email that’s kind of the point… and the receiving side of most of your techs still had to eventually setup the server side right? Adminforge is Linux tutorials, hardly something for the basic user. And disroot has not the best reputation if I can trust the few top links in my search results due to its gtc where they mentioned that they would collaborate in criminal investigations as well.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Users don’t need to configure email that’s kind of the point…

                Users don’t “need” to configure these services either. That’s the entire point.

                You can either configure it yourself, or use someone else’s that has configured it for you. Or you can choose one of the p2p apps that simply don’t require any configuration. That’s the entire point.

                Adminforge is Linux tutorials

                AdminForge runs a variety of services for public use.

                And disroot has not the best reputation if I can trust the few top links in my search results due to its gtc where they mentioned that they would collaborate in criminal investigations as well.

                Much like Proton (and every other company/org), they have to either choose to comply or close up shop.

                • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  But then you need to trust another party which is just moving the problem along…

            • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You should consider reviewing your baseline to integrate actual persons. Some need help to use WhatsApp so go figure how they would fare with most of those.

              • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Are people that have trouble using Whatsapp typically overlapping with people looking for E2EE anonymous communications?

                You can’t criticize software for being too hard for “baseline human beings” when your baseline is apparently boomers who lived most of their lives before the internet was widely available.

                • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Ah no I was assuming we need privacy for everyone… but this would work as well. When working in responsible disclosure this is very much a problem. You want those channels open as wide as possible and as easy as possible.

                  And to a large extent I suspect boomers were a bit more into systems and protocols than the new gens.

                  But keep on…

    • mjr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Most of those still rely on some company to host a server, except Briar, and in practice most Briar users are still relying on companies to access Tor to connect.

      They are more robust, not perfect.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        None of them require a company to host a server. That was my entire point.

        • mjr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Explain how you’d use Delta Chat without a server, please? I may have misunderstood its need for a mailserver when I tried it.

            • mjr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              How do you even get a non-company-hosted server now? Public bodies don’t host services for outsiders much any more and aren’t really safe places for privacy in this type of case anyway.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                You run your own or just choose from a variety of publicly-available ones.

                • mjr@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Run your own? Great, but you’ll almost certainly be getting a company to connect it up.

                  Publicly available from whom? Companies!

                  I may sometimes wish community-owned internet became the norm, but it didn’t, so companies are involved almost everywhere.

                  • Ulrich@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    I run several of these services with no company involved.

                    Publicly available from, as I said, individuals.