Can someone remind me why we stopped using Firefox a while back? There was some piece of news that broke everyone’s trust, but I can’t remember what Mozilla did. Was it a change in their user agreement?

  • sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Small suggestion: if you’re over 21 stop blindly doing what others do. Start questioning things and do what you think is best.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Firefox used to have a “we’re a browser that won’t sell user data” promise. Then they changed their TOS and removed the promise, adding:

    When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox."

    When people reacted to their TOS they said it was an accident, it’s just boilerplate, don’t take it seriously.

    Or in other words: an entity with a team of lawyers claimed ownership of all your data, and then downplayed it, and then has acted good since.

    Personally I stick my head way into the alligators mouth and still use Firefox.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    That was overblown drama. They didn’t change anything in practice. They clarified things by writing it down. You disable some defaults and have no issue. Even if you don’t, it’s not nearly as bad as other popular platforms.

    I never stopped using Firefox.

    If you want I can look for a comment I made quoting the relevant terms a while back. Or you can look for it yourself.

    Simple forks still depend on upstream. I’d rather support Mozilla than not, given no better sustainable alternative. They do some good stuff like Firefox, Thunderbird, and mdn.

  • exchange12rocks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The world in general switched from Firefox to Chrome several years ago because at that time (when just released) Chrome was new, shiny, and fast (much faster than Firefox). And at that time everyone loved Google (they still had their infamous “be no evil” motto). And Google also promoted their browser, and, given their web resources are immensely popular, that helped tremendously.

    That switch had nothing to do with recent concerns about privacy in Mozilla products.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    i think when they killed weave. such a dick move. one of many. may the CEO get most out of the bribe they get from google for selling out its users. i muria even the free and open things are shit.

  • bluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I stopped using it and went to chrome bc my adblock stopped working and i waited for a fix but it didn’t come. It worked fine on chrome.

    I went back to firefox bc my adblock stopped working but it worked fine on firefox.

    these two events are several years apart if that wasn’t clear

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I never fully did, but I did end up using Chromium more than I wanted to:

    1. Some poorly written sites refuse to work with FF. My water company, for example. They eventually fixed it after I complained multiple times. Now they display a warning that it’s “Optimized for Chrome” but no longer flat out prevent FF from logging in (you know, to pay bills and such).
    2. FF Desktop still doesn’t support PWAs, and their recent update says they’re working on it, but they’re half-assing it (installed web apps will still have the menu bars, address, bar etc). I self-host a lot of web applications and want them to appear like native apps. Hence, Chromium.
    3. There was some recent ToS / Privacy Policy change, and everyone was knee-jerking “time to abandon Firefox” as if there’s anywhere better to go. (This is probably what you’re thinking of)
    4. A good while back, Chrom(ium) was just flat-out faster. That’s been a while, and I think when FF’s “Quantum” update (or whatever it was called) came out in like 2016 or 2017, it put it back on par.
  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The thing is, I never have. Chrome is absolute hot garbage and spyware, all the Chromium forks are all flawed and bugged and still feed into Google’s dominance because of engine and stupid Manifest bullshit. Firefox, despite all the stupid things Mozilla did and still does just works the best and is not Chromium.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        New Chromium framework for browser extensions that severely limits their functionality. It neuters adlockers.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 days ago

          It didn’t break adblockers “at the time”. It broke them intentionally. That was by design. Google is an advertising company dabbling in other areas. They don’t want a browser that can properly block their primary revenue.

        • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was intentional to block/break adblockers. Google is worlds largest advertiser…

        • Noerknhar@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Understood, that’s something to be expected by Google, but complete shit.

          However, adblockers still work these days - see Vivaldi, so they found a workaround?

          • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            There is no workaround as most browsers download extensions from Google’s extension repository and they don’t allow extensions that don’t follow their bullshit manifest. Ironically, only Opera has its own extensions repository/store that can do that. Others rely on their own built in adblockers.

      • Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Google sells it as an updated extension framework to improve security, privacy, and performance of extensions… But it also nerfs adblockers ability to block all ads.

        There are some forks from chrome that haven’t implemented the new manifest thing. So if you really need to, look for those.

    • HKPiax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly, as a “non-power” Firefox user, the only issues I’m experiencing is when Google purposely slows down or messes with me simply because I use Firefox (e.g., YouTube).

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Dunno, Youtube works fine for me, watching without account. I don’t use anything else from Google, so can’t say if anything else is shit.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 days ago

    When? There have been a few times people stopped using Firefox in large numbers.

    One of them was when Chrome first came out. Firefox (and every other browser) at the time ran every site in one process. As sites became more reliant on Javascript, which was usually poorly written, that meant any one tab having a problem made other sites and even the browser’s own UI unresponsive, or sometimes crashed the whole browser. Chrome’s multiprocess model was a revelation. Firefox didn’t get its own implementation until 2016.

    Recently, there’s been some movement away from Firefox due to Mozilla making decisions people don’t feel align with open source, the open web, and privacy. The one that has me looking at forks is the planned addition of terms of use to the browser. Terms of use are for an ongoing relationship between a service operator and a user; Firefox is local software I’m operating myself on a computer I own. Its fine for optional online services like Sync to have terms of use, but the browser should work without those.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      I asked ChatGPT is similar question earlier this week. This was the answer.

      While Mozilla has not been found to sell user tracking data in the conventional sense, the introduction of features like PPA (Privacy-Preserving Attribution) and changes in privacy policy language have understandably caused concern among users. These developments suggest a shift towards balancing user privacy with the need to support advertising models. Users prioritizing privacy should stay informed about these changes and adjust their browser settings accordingly.