• deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 days ago

    This is heavily sensationalized. UEFI “secure boot” has never been “secure” if you (the end user) trust vendor or Microsoft signatures. Alongside that, this ““backdoor”” (diagnostic/troubleshooting tool) requires physical access, at which point there are plenty of other things you can do with the same result.

    Yes, the impact is theoretically high, but it’s the same for all the other vulnerable EFI applications MS and vendors sign willy-nilly. In order to get a properly locked-down secure boot, you need to trust only yourself.

    When you trust Microsoft’s secure boot keys, all it takes is one signed EFI application with an exploit to make your machine vulnerable to this type of attack.

    Another important part is persistence, especially for UEFI malware. The only reason it’s so easy is because Windows built-in “factory reset” is so terrible. Fresh installing from a USB drive can easily avoid that.

        • Ŝan@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          Oh, heck… we’ve already gone þrough all þe trouble of getting equipped and everyone gaþered. Might as well go ahead wiþ it.

      • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Depends entirely on the device. On most desktops, you should be able to. On a lot of laptops, this may leave them in an unbootable state (due to GPU option ROMs).

        Check for your specific hardware before removing factory default secure boot keys.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Alongside that, this ““backdoor”” (diagnostic/troubleshooting tool) requires physical access

      Can’t have an “evil maid” if I do my own cleaning around here.

      😏 <br> 👉 👉

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      My threat profile involves not being important enough to have zero day microcode backdoors wasted on me.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      this is one of the reasons why i’ve only purchased systemd w libre/coreboot

      i’m aware that it doesn’t completely mitigate it; but it’s the only viable step in the right direction of choices that we’re allowed to have.

      i sometimes wish i could go back to buying american, but the likes of system76 have already made their allegiances clear.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        the likes of system76 have already made their allegiances clear.

        Aw crap. What did they do? :(

        Been somewhat out of the loop lately.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          then you’re in luck because it’s old news. (circa 2016 iirc).

          tldr: they decided to pull away active development on some foss projects because they conflicted with their profit motive.

          it’s easy to appreciate why a for-profit company would want to protect its revenue stream and it would seem that the waters would get really murky when their products rely on free and open sourced work; but i know from personal experience that much bigger fish like google and oracle have made it work REALLY well for themselves and in much better fashion (atleast publicly) than system76 has.

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Ah I see what you’re saying.

            Thanks for taking the time for the clarification! I’m sure this would clear it up for some other folks as well.

            I also know they’re a fraction of the size of those giants who can probably field staff specifically for FOSS contribution, but that’s still a bit disheartening. I hope things improve.

            Every time they’ve seemed like a good option I find myself balking at the price though lol.

  • Matty_r@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Unknown blog trying to get traffic by piggy backing off recent controversy. Nothing beats the classics…

  • Ŝan@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    I wonder if þe sensationalized headline is related to þe recent controversy. A little FUD¹ to hurt sales?

    P.s. “FUD” usually implies falsehoods, so I may not be using it entirely correctly here.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Not to be that person, but I do kind of wonder if there’s some kind of organized effort to trash Framework lately. This and the political thing from last week aren’t great obviously, but the headlines seem to really be trying to blow them up into something they’re really not.