• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Wow, relive the early days of really fucking terrible LCD displays for just under $2000.

    What a time to be alive…

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Why, for the love of all the gods, do people keep saying and writing “LCD display”.

      Tell me what the “D” in “LCD” means!

      What does the “D” mean, hmmm!?

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      For a work machine with a lot of text and little graphics, this is great. Less eye strain for long periods.

  • Dzso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    21 hours ago

    If I could get a laptop with a screen like this, I could finally sit outside in a park and code like nature intended.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m really keen on one of these displays eventually, as I can set aside the issues with refresh rate and colour accuracy, but the price needs to drop way down. It needs to be competitive with regular LCD monitors.

    I look at terminals all day for work, this would make it so much more comfortable.

    • Որբունի@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you’re coding with them you can already try small ones, unless you need bigger than A4 size for each it isn’t insanely expensive.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Might not need anything except economies of scale. But getting that is the problem.

      Tablet sized eink displays found a niche that couldn’t quite be displaced by smartphones and regular tablets. That let them have a market for getting costs down.

      There would need to be a similarly wide use case to get the price down on larger eink displays.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The US takes tariffs on the good stuff? Looks like there will be more stuff for us in the future.

    • simop_jo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Its not meant for gaming. People who display a lot of text (eg. coders) could use less strain in their eyes if they’re doing it for a long time. Definitely not at that price though

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    What is the refresh time? They carefully avoid mentioning that. There’s a comparable Pimoroni monitor whose refresh takes 14 seconds so I’d call it a static display rather than a computer monitor.

    • moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      The article mentions another display with a 33 Hz refresh rate. But be aware that there would be significant ghosting even just scrolling a page of text, more so than even a measly 33 Hz refresh rate would lead you to believe.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m happy with say 3 hz, fast enough to not be too annoying when flipping pages while reading. It’s fine to not be good for video. What I really want is a 16 inch or so e-reader though.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            In another comment response, I linked to some place (DASUNG) out of China that makes eInk monitors.

            They make 25" eInk monitors in both black-and-white and color. That’s $1,500 and up, though.

            Personally, for me, it wouldn’t make sense. The real selling point of eInk for me is:

            • It’s reflective, and eInk is almost the only kind of reflective display out there. That means that it works reasonably outdoors under sunlight and glare, without having to blast enough light to overwhelm the sunlight. But…with a desktop, and especially mixed types of monitors, you’re not going to be lugging those monitors outside under the sun.

            • If you’re looking at mostly static images in a lit area, eInk has extraordinarily low average power use, since it only consumes power when updating the image on the screen. That makes it a great fit for e-readers. But…for a fixed computer monitor, I don’t care much about power consumption.

            And with that, you get drawbacks of having limited refresh rates, limited size, high price, limited or no color (and if you have color, worse contrast) and not being able to display brightly-lit, emissive stuff.

            I mean, yes, eInk does look like paper, and if you’re really set on that particular aesthetic, then it’d have some value there. But for me, that value is just really limited. Yeah, it’d be kind of novel for text to look like it’s on paper, but it’s just not a game-changer.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              I get a fair amount of glare, and if it’s low-enough power, I could conceivably bring it with me outside or something. It would be sick if it was powered over USB-C.

              But I’m certainly not willing to pay $1k+ for it, more like $200-300.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        That is a video of a much smaller monitor. It does show reasonably responsive refresh. Do you have one of the 25.3 inch monitor described in the article?

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe it’d be useful as a low powered interactive kiosk display? Price needs to come down tremendously before this thing becomes competitive.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What’s the refresh rate and can I play Hunt showdown on it? They say a similar model has a 33hz refresh rate but don’t mention this model

    • scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know if you can play games on this, but I know you definitely won’t want to.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Choice of Games makes games that are unchanging text. You could probably do okay with that.

        Actually…come to think of it, they should figure out some way to hook up with an e-reader manufacturer, sell their games in those stores. Like, those games also have basically zilch by way of memory or computational requirements, and I bet that the same kind of person who’d buy a dedicated e-reader to read books would probably be more-interested in a text-heavy game.

        • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          they should figure out some way to hook up with an e-reader manufacturer, sell their games in those stores

          just sell it as an ebook, with choices being tappable links to specific pages. brand agnostic, and distributable over the countless ebook stores that already exist. I’d be surprised if there weren’t any CYOA books modernised that way already.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yeah, that’s a thought, but those games have some additional QoL logic to them, like automated stats keeping and checking and stuff. Nice to just have the computer handle it.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Obligatory Linus video for a similar, but not identical, monitor.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVUxxn53mBE

    This Dasung model is mentioned at the bottom of the article. TL;DW: These things have the exact list of drawbacks you think they do including miserable contrast, color accuracy so bad it’s fallen off the bottom of the chart, a low refresh rate, and quite a bit of ghosting. So it’s awful, but surprisingly not as awful as you’d think if your primary experience is an e-reader form the first couple of generations. Linus being Linus he does attempt to game on it and gets… a result… but this is a display technology with niche applications and still best suited to displaying mostly static content.

    • madnificent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I own this. It is horrible. If the specs were real it would be great, but the specs are not real. It is a 3k black and white monitor with a fixed color filter over it. That means you need 3x3 pixels to resemble a color.

      I consider it a scam from Dasung.

      Boox on the other hand made a sane black and white display. Much better. I own a Max 2 Pro. Sadly they fail to understand that when you report a display as 20px smaller than it really is over an HDMI port and then rescale the image of the computer display on that, that it becomes really uncrisp. Their suggestion is to use the display with 200% scaling (so you don’t notice as much I suppose).

      Epaper is really promising and nice. However both of these companies should either get some real competition or lawsuits.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Thanks, that was actually a pretty good look at them.

      I do think that they did raise one point that I wouldn’t have thought of. The color eInk doesn’t have great resolution, but they were viewing old comics printed using halftoning (what the guy in the video was calling “cheap dot patterns”). Comics at the time were, had to be, designed to deal with being printed that way, and that results in images that could deal with really low color resolution. So specifically for viewing them, the color eInk display was a pretty good match for the content.

      Problem is, I just can’t see how many people would buy a monitor just to view old-style comics.

      I think that eInk is a good match for a portable e-reader that you potentially take outside, where it’s already available in the role. Outside of that…

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Looks awesome on the photo, but I guess I have better uses for such money and night sky and trees for enjoying what I see.

    Also lower refresh rates are not such a terrible problem when it’s not a CRT blinking in front of you.

    Grainy look is kinda fine. That’s about the “compromises” part.

    So a cheaper one I’d probably use. Being part of some dream computer to be useful in transport, while walking, at home, with battery life longer than nuclear fallout effects and unbreakable box and EOL date of the kind castles in Europe have. Otherwise nah, many other things to break my eyes against.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 day ago

    Waaaaaaaaay too expensive, but I’d love it if big eink displays became a thing, even with shit refresh rates, mostly because I want some for displaying Home Assistant dashboards.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I bought a trmnl and it’s pricey but works pretty good. I’ve mostly been using a few out-of-the-box plugins for it.

      There is a selfhosted/offline version of the server you can run for it, so it can be ‘offline’ in theory. I keep meaning to mess with it more but haven’t put the time aside.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m thinking at those prices this is probably intended for corporations that absolutely need a readable display in bright sunlight areas but don’t really care about refresh rate or color depth.

    • fishpen0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Every drive through and restaurant with outdoor counters and lcd screens I can’t fucking read with sunglasses on because they are polarized should switch to these

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I did see something a few months ago about a company making large color e-Ink displays for applications like that and outdoor advertising at bus stops and the like

    • [email protected]@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not necessarily just corporations, but certainly text-based workflows. I can see this being great if your day job is writing code, working on spreadsheets, editing documents, etc. In those use cases, framerate hardly matters. Would be great for reducing eye strain.