EDIT: For clarification, I feel that the current situation on the ground in the war (vs. say a year ago) might indicate that an attack on Russia might not result in instant nuclear war, which is what prompted my question. I am well aware of the “instant nuclear Armageddon” opinion.

Serious question. I don’t need to be called stupid. I realize nuclear war is bad. Thanks!

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    World war III and after that NATO countries occupying Russia. Probably quite some people die and things get destroyed in the process.

    I think if they’re smart they destabilize the regime and go for Putin. And not fight the whole country and population of Russia.