• 0 Posts
  • 148 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle















  • When we talk about human rights we usually talk about the “what”, and talking about just the “what” leads to misconceptions like that. So the question is why we have human rights. And the formulation human right treaties take is some form of “Human dignity is inviolable”, which means that all human lives are worth the same, and that value can’t be diminished in any way. Human rights are then listed in order to protect that ideal.

    When you consider this, it becomes obvious that owning humans can’t be a form of the right to private property because it relies on some humans being above others.

    That’s also the reason why free speech doesn’t include things like slander or ordering someone killed.




  • One way of making software more fair is by allowing developers to profit. Many companies today invest resources into taking an existing project and copying the ongoing work of the project creators; afterwards, creating and maintaining a hosted version using their code. In a fair circumstance, should they benefit from using the software, they could add certain features, fix bugs and support the community of users enjoying the product. In many cases they do, but fair-code ensures that this can happen by bringing businesses to the negotiation table when it comes to commercializing software.

    This is bullshit when only a set of developers are allowed to profit. Every single project with a non-commercial license I know has an exception for the company that owns the repo. At that point external contributions are not open or fair anything, it’s a company stealing labour.

    Either licenses are symmetrical or they are inherently unfair, and calling it Fair is doublespeak.