Because they know that using AI-generated nonsense to train their own AI-generated nonsense is a great way to turn their models into a gibbering mess. These models need quality content to emulate.

Ah - lemmy.ml - it all fails into place - red fascist nonsense.

Wikipedia too, I suppose.

This sub’s credibility seems to be on par with the Gray Zone based on what you’re upvoting - I’m blocking this brain rot.

Is this a case of “if you call us genocidal, we’ll kill you too”?

What are you talking about? David kicked kinda good while having hair, and Victoria was in a band called the Spice Girls despite being a set square haunted by the ghost of a rice cracker.

It’s conservative to bend over and spread `em for the benefit of the owning class at the expense of everyone else - chiefly the workers those politicians claim to represent.

Others have pointed out the gaping differences in the health outcomes (including the burden that places on the healthcare system), addiction rates, etc.

Does comparing a corporate machine with a bargain basement consumer system seen reasonable to you? You think Dell is above this type of incompetence? My sweet summer shill.

They’re both shit companies - I sold HP systems for years, and was a brand marketing manager for most of Dell’s products at one time or another.

How fucked up in the head do you need to be to make shit like that up?

About as fucked as any conservative regressive representative, pundit, or a good chunk of their voters.

Functionally, it’s not much different - a militarily dominant power invading with the backing of the bulk of the West, committing a genocide to sieze the territory.

In the case of Australia, it was arguably a bit worse than that - the legal “terra nullius” justification translates to “nobody’s land”. At best, it said that there was no civilisation here - in reality, the general consensus seems to have been closer to “they’re just animals”. The way they were treated did nothing to suggest otherwise.

I mean condemnation is a great start, but Israel isn’t going to stop killing Palestinians until they’re stopped, or there’s no Palestinians left to kill.

Their rhetoric has made it clear that killing civilians isn’t an unfortunate consequence of stopping Hamas - it’s the objective, and they propped up Hamas over the PLO to create the pretext for this.

I really don’t want to respond to this with whattaboutism and American diabolosm, but I’d be curious to this compared with the same rate in the US.

The world around, the rich just keep getting richer at the expense of the rest of us.

It’s an old practice, not an excusable one. Any “news” outlet pushing this misleading trash out should face similar consequences to false advertising without the need to initiate litigation (this isn’t libellous for example).

But yeah, the ring situation is indeed very real, entirely fucked, and unlikely to change until their sales start taking a kicking.

(late to respond here - sorry) As I said, the risk is certainly there, but writing stories like this that so dishonestly frame a non-issue sets the expectation that people are going to kick up a fuss about every non-issue, so any concerns along these lines should simply be ignored. This means that the real issues will be dismissed when they do inevitably arise.

“Food Delivery Robots Are Feeding Camera Footage to the LAPD, Internal Emails Show” implies secretive, leaked collusion with the cops to stream live video to them… a more accurate headline (that fails to beat a story out of nothing) would be “Robotics company gives footage of attack on its robot to police”.

Report reported, reporter.

…if they’re reporting the unreportable, how is it unreportable?

So someone tried to steal one of the robots, and the robot company was keen to give the footage to the cops?

There’s a lot of potential for fuckery here, but dishonestly spinning this non-issue to look like some kind of crisis distracts from real problems with privacy and the police. Hack “journalists”.

Yet Harkonnen is somehow the more likeable one…

This kind of hubris may be an opportunity for contractual fuckery…

I personally think it’s more about manufacturing an ‘other’ to blame everything on and unite people in hate.

There’s little benefit to targeting women for oppression in the modern economy - they’re just more undifferentiated labour to be exploited (though it remains possible to pay them less). I think this was meaningfully different when living off a single income was a realistic proposition.