Another vote for nextcloud.

Or synchthing if you want something that is serverless, but does not support sync on demand.

It’s a lot better than having that CPU on Windows.

Yikes.

I thought it was the GNU wizards circle that decides these things.

Are you telling me I have been going to the wrong meetings?!

I swear this Linux fragmentation will be the death of it.

It’s also a reflection of how much money you will be spending on each ecosystem

Likely an unpopular opinion, but if Hamas releases the hostages and surrenders it’s leadership, it is more likely to result in cessation of military action for some time, than if Israel stops bombing.

The current calls to stop bombing is akin to telling the US to stop bombing cities in Germany during world war two.

Israel is looking to exploit and oppress, but don’t forget that Hamas will not stop until all Jews and non Muslims are exterminated.

Agree on this. Servethehome on YouTube has a series on different 1 litre PCs they review in detail.

The fact that the processes are so different, is part of the problem. Developers need to spend the same effort 3 or 4 times.

I get that, but in functionally they are so similar from an end user perspective, I would argue their development efforts should be combined.

I wish distro’s would combine efforts much more so we have a better desktop experience. Do we really need 15 window managers when we could have 2 or 3 much better ones.

Unify to a single package manager, they are all functionally the same.

Standardize on flatpacks and abandon snaps and appimage