• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle


  • Hot take! I think it’s bad when anyone does it, not just China. Crazy, I know lol. I understand that these are the things that come with running a country but that doesn’t mean they are ethical, or even the only options.

    Thank you for validating the fact that I am pointing out real things that are actually happening and not just saying “nuh uh” like others have been doing.


  • Ibaudia@lemmy.worldtoWorld News@lemmy.mlChina is burning all its bridges with Israel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    One celebrity giving an annual performance isn’t really convincing to me. What about the limits on children under 18 from participating in religious activities? The restrictions on unauthorized religious gatherings? The demolition of religious sites? The requirement for religious leaders to register with the state? The reduction of teaching traditional languages in favor of the Chinese language? These certainly seem adjacent to cultural erasure to me. These policies all have a chilling effect and make it less likely for non-CCP approved cultures to prosper, and I see no way that is not deliberate.


  • Ibaudia@lemmy.worldtoWorld News@lemmy.mlChina is burning all its bridges with Israel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That makes sense on its face, Chinese imperialism typically takes the form of cultural erasure to promote social harmony and homogeneity. If they want to assimilate the Uyghur peoples then I imagine they would do it economically through changes in their material conditions and jobs, and the CCP clearly has no issues with violently forcing populations to do things they don’t want to.

    Thanks for the report :)

    Edit: Y’all can downvote me but what I’m saying is objectively true, just look at Tibet. China promotes the Han Chinese culture as the standard through their policies and restrictions on personal freedoms and expression. Didn’t think this would be a hot take.
















  • Ibaudia@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.mlThe future of Linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I think it’s already a great system, its philosophical foundation of being built around user freedom is fantastic. It just has a few things that are definitely still problems for desktop users. Namely,

    • Sensible defaults
    • Proprietary driver management
    • Distros needing to distribute software in their repos instead of authors doing it themselves
    • Too many competing application formats, each with glaring issues
    • Inconsistent theming with GTK vs QT (mostly app developers’ faults tho)
    • Both popular display servers have huge issues
    • Lack of manufacturer support for hardware (this will come with time if Linux continues to become more popular)
    • Incompatibility with existing standards, especially Microsoft products
    • Lacking proper professional applications for things like video editing that actually work consistently
    • Gaming anti-cheat compatibility
    • Generally being easy to break the whole system on accident
    • Power consumption on mobile devices

    I guess that’s a lot, but it’s still a great system ha.