It’s has its place for sure.

But the physics are far more against satalite.

But the reason I don’t believe in large scale satalite systems for consumers is because they’re disposable. They all fall down or contribute to the growing space junk problem.

So it’s not really any better at the end of the day than just burying a fibre cable for 40 years.

Because building space ports and rocket launches have 0 impact as well.

But you acknowledge this, so what’s your point? Why pay a techno billionaire when we can publicly fund cables way cheaper and more friendly?

If we can figure out how to put them on the bottom of the ocean and pipelines over just about any terrain, I think we can figure this out

deleted by creator

I’m not saying your doing it intentionally.

Bur it is how it starts.

Edit the person I replied to didn’t use probably. Then you came in with a probably statement. That’s how miss information starts. People supporting bullshit with “probably”

A link to it will do

Do you? Because made up satistics are still made up.

This is how misinformation starts.

If your not sure, google it before commenting. For the sanity of the internet.

No GDPR does not require google to display app permissions like that…

Your just making things up.

Are they? What law?

I’m not saying legality is ethical.

I’m saying there’s no practical way to assemble that much material without exploration at some level.

Because they’re barely legal in certain places?

But how does it get more authentic without actual input if what’s accurate.

It’s not enough to tell and AI that’s somethings wrong. You have to also tell it what was right.

totally ethical thousands of photos of drawings of children in sexual contexts

Legality is just a technicality

Okay there bud.

But if it’s not accurate, will pedos jerk off to it?

Okay, and those drawings are my problem.

https://www.icenews.is/2010/07/28/unsavoury-cartoon-ruling-sparks-debate-in-sweden/

It’s not clear cut that those are okay.

But to know if it’s accurate, someone has to view and compare…

Yes but you start with the basics of a cat and a dog. So you start with adult genitals and…

It was able to produce that because enough images of both feet and Donald Trump exist.

How would it know what young genitals look like?

You better believe when the cops come knocking, the burden of proof to be ethical is wholly on you.

All existing solutions are based on real life images. There’s no ethically way to acquire thousand upon thousands of images of naked children to produce anything resembling real.

That’s how existing solutions work.

So again, how can it be done ethically?

You can’t prove a negative. That’s not how prooving things work.

You also assume legal images. But that puts limits on what’s actually legal globally. What if someone wants a 5 year old? How are there legal photos of that?

You assume it can, prove that it can.