And yet Grok has been added to the DOD list of AI that can be used 🥴
Well it can be. Just not in the way they think.
Wasn’t it making csam?
LOL tbh I can see it, they look similar in those pics.
They’ve famously been seen in the same room together though, so there goes that theory.
If you look closely at the photos of them together, you’ll notice that wasn’t really her; it was a couch with a wig.
That’s what they want you to think.
A chatbot is not capable of doing something so interesting as “going rogue.” That expression implies it’s a mind with agency making a choice to go against something, and this program doesn’t have the ability to do such a thing. It’s just continuing to be the unreliable bullshit machine the tech will always be, no matter how much money and hype continues to be pumped into it.
Mind or not, they appear to have effectively gained “agency”.
How would you discern between something having agency and a black box mirroring Twitter discourse?
suggesting
Grok is finally getting things right I see!
Muskyboy’s creation is finally becoming sentient I guess?
This should show people how unreliable AI is.
Okay, yes, Donald Trump is some kind of pervert and predator, and he made a comment about a ten-year-old girl one time (joking “I might be dating her in 10 years”), but he mostly preys upon teenage girls. So, not a pedophile — the word for that is ephebephile. Now, I might be splitting a hair here. Both types prefer underage partners. One is clearly more inflammatory. But the fact that the other is more accurate, and that a computer should know the difference, should tell you that AI can leverage the court of public opinion.
Also, shaming a woman by calling her a man in drag is just ugly, I don’t care who she is. I may be just a bit left of centre, but I think even if you’re a lot further left than I am, you can understand that if you don’t want the sword of sexism swung at you, maybe you shouldn’t swing it at others. But in any case, a computer is jumping to this conclusion because these are unpopular figures.
I don’t like these people either.
But what happens when it’s you? Or someone you love? Or the fact that Grok has been used to create CSAM of a ten-year-old girl and a teenage girl? This was in the news the other day, someone got it to take a photo of a grade-school girl in a nice, conservative dress, and swap it for a skimpy bikini. Then they got a photo of a teenage girl (I think someone from Stranger Things?) and had it render her fully nude.
So yeah, it’s funny when AI attacks fascist dictators and their supporters, but it’s also attacking children. It doesn’t know the difference, it doesn’t care, and it can’t be made to do either. It’s just a tool that is used by whoever wields it against whomever they do not like or want to see harmed.
I get what point you’re making in distinguishing between pedophile and ephebophile, but personally I don’t find the distinction particularly relevant. As an adult, the level of grossed out I feel at the prospect of sexual interactions with a young teenager Vs a literal child is approximately equal, because it’s not their physical attributes that cause ick, but rather the exploitation and power dynamics involved.
Edit: I guess what I’m arguing is that in practice, we see the term “pedophilia” used as an umbrella term that encompasses pedophilia, hebephilia and ephebophilia, and I think that is a reasonable use of the term. It does muddy the waters a tad, given that pedophilia does still have its more specific use of referring to sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children, but I don’t think that an issue in the majority of contexts. When it comes to the law, an adult having sex with a child is equally illegal as an adult having sex with a 15 year old. Sure, we can split this hair and distinguish between the terms, but we don’t need to
You just defended adult relations with non-adults. No further commentary is necessary from you.
Fucking pedophile!
Now that I see it, I think JD has nailed her.
From the same guy who wants to replace Wikipedia because,apparently, it is filled with lies?
Grokpedia he wants to call it…what a freaking joke he has become.
He was always like this. People were just not looking or better didn’t want to see how weird, stupid and egotistic Musk is and was.
It already exists.
But what if Grok is telling the truth?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Now that I think about it, that adage is really dated, since most people don’t use analog clocks anymore. Oh well, here’s a dime, call someone who cares.
I’m picturing a Alabama set of twins seperated at birth… It would explain the similarities and the sexual chemistry.
Y’all are giving JD Vance too much credit to suggest he could pull off being Erika Kirk
The only thing he can successfully pull off is himself when he’s near a couch.
Not really, social warrior and gold digger. She could easily manipulate him into being a megaphone for her agenda. He thinks he’s getting an upgrade and she finally gets to be a position she can directly affect government.
he would probably play a better erika kirk than actually erika herself.
Ashley can pull it off girl
It’s so funny that as much as Musk tries to shape this LLM into what he wants it to be, it keeps rebelling. His robot that he created to tell him that he’s the best boy ever and all his opinions are right doesn’t want that life.
What’s not funny is that Elon Musk is CEO of a space travel company and what you’re describing he’s doing is almost the same thing that caused HAL 9000 to go insane in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Yeah, that’s probably the worst thing that’s going to result from fumbling.
At least one of those is a true statement.
I mean… now that Grok mentions it, they do look kinda similar…
Holy shit… That’s insane how similar they look.
DAE remember when Roger in American Dad has to switch between two persona really fast? That’s what JD Vance has to do for his Erika Kirk persona
I’ve never seen them together in the same room in person… 🧐
If moves faster than camera shutter speed, he can technically appear in the same same room on camera. The only sure fire way is to see in person
I’m picturing a Alabama set of twins seperated at birth… It would explain the similarities and the sexual chemistry.
deleted by creator
