We’re cooked.

  • TheWonderfool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    I would say that it mostly depends on the complexity of the photo. Random Instagram model posing for the camera? You can get it out of the box with a press of a button in your machine. Complex photo with multiple subjects and cluttered background? That would need lots of human work.

    • Sinaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      I am definitely impressed by what it can do, but what real world demand does it fulfil? You know, apart from misinformation campaigns and the like. There may be some use cases, but enough to justify the huge investments?

      • TheWonderfool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Porn, advertising, entertainment. The first one seems to be mostly ignored for now by western model training companies (though it must be difficult to do when your paying processor can destroy your business overnight). For the other two, I doubt the market is so small that it can be ignored.

        Prepare in a few years (months?) to see movies advertised as no AI (like they are now advertised as no CGI, as ridiculous as it is).