• LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m impressed it hasn’t become a bloated copilot mess like all other Microsoft products have. It’s still relatively as quick and functional as it’s ever been.

      I wouldn’t say it’s perfect. Definitely not. But it’s definitely on the highest end of Microsoft owned products.

      Probably because it’s very similar to how it was before they bought it.

      I primarily do not use it for development though. So take that with a grain of salt. Some small projects I contribute to still.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Better in what way?

        There are certainly others but … git is the defacto standard for a reason.

        There are certainly use cases for others, just wondering what you mean?

        • rhabarba@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago
          1. Git is for bazaar-style development. However, most of my own projects are cathedral-style.
          2. Git’s default user experience (CLI command syntax, for example) is weird. There are reasons why Git GUIs are popular and (e.g.) SVN GUIs never were.
          3. Git is rather spammy in terms of hard disk usage.