What do you keep living for? Is there a specific person, goal, or idea that you work for? Is there no meaning to life in your opinion?

Context: I’ve been reading Camus and Sartre, and thinking about how their ideas interact with hard determinism.

  • Twanquility@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Honest to god, the most tangible and practical definition that I’ve gotten to, so far, is that meaning comes about, when you strive to do good. Simple as that. Sure, there are a lot of ways to do ‘that’ in the world, but it should all work to some degree.

    Strive to make the world better and to do good.

    • possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s really interesting, where would you say you source your idea of good from? I think I personally have a hard time grounding any sense of morality as I’m not sold on the idea that someone could be truly responsible for an action. I don’t mean this as a criticism, I am just interested in your viewpoint for what is good or bad.

      • Blurntout@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        The LLM out here tryna parse morality lol love your user name.

        Wack of me to comment here but I’d like to hear more about your logic for the perpetual passing of accountability! It’s true enough that our lived experience is basically dependency hell. I guess for chiming in I owe you my “source of good” haha it changes the further you zoom out but it starts at collective harm reduction and burrows all the way down to showing up for the people you care about.

        Even when they lack the perspective to see themselves as the perpetrator. We roll that boulder up the hill lol

        • possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think you’ve got a really interesting take on morality, but for me it really falls down on the biological level. Robert Sapolsky was the writer who convinced me, and his argument goes something like this: no neuron in the brain ever fires of its own accord - its always caused by something that we can agree is out of our control, namely our environment, upbringing, culture, genes, etc. Even if these don’t directly cause neurons to fire, then they create the factors which do - hormone secretion, what neural pathways form as our brains develop. And we can say that our consciousness is bounded by our material brains because of the changes to people who undergo lobotomies or similarly experience losses to parts of their brain, for example Phineas Gage. So, based on this, as our experience of consciousness is tied to the firing of neurons in our physical brains, and that is out of our control, we can say that we don’t truly have agency. This means that no one is ever truly free to make a decision or not, and that, to my mind at least, means it cannot have been their fault if they did something wrong.

      • Twanquility@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Good counter question, thanks.

        I am still trying to figure out, in what way I can know that something is actually true and good, besides that is just sounds and feels true. It’s not certain that I am the right agent to decide what is true in the moment. I am partly an animal, after all.

        I understand light from the sun, compared to darkness, and I understand how saying something can reflect the real world as factually true, compared to something that is not, ie. telling a lie.

        But, that ‘being good is a virtue’, and what ‘good’ and ‘virtue’ mean whan applied, is not so clear.

        I clearly have a sufficient and functional understanding of the above, (innate, instinctual and/or learned?), which is why my first comment still works, but I feel like I should be able to verify that my idea of ‘good’ is still true.

        Do you people have any good pointers to that?

        • possiblyaperson@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Honestly I feel a lot like you. In daily life, I’ll think things are good or bad, but when I press myself on it I can’t come up with a reason why. It feels so hard to come up with a morality system beyond that without grounding it objectively somewhere, but I just don’t see how that’s possible. I appreciate your thoughts!

          • Flagstaff@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I just don’t see how that’s possible.

            Cue in God. (I’m not encouraging that and am just saying that’s what humanity developed over time.)