Epic Games v. Apple judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers just ruled that, effective immediately, Apple is no longer allowed to collect fees on purchases made outside apps and blocks the company from restricting how developers can point users to where they can make purchases outside of apps.

. .

The judge also referred the case to the US attorney to review it for possible criminal contempt proceedings.

  • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Apple has $50B+ in literal cash. Epic’s entire revenue is under $7B/yr. Apple can afford to run Epic for decades on their cash reserves alone without impacting their bottom line.

    That’s why it took 4 years. I’m surprised Apple didn’t bury them.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t understand what that has to do with anything? It doesn’t cost either of them anything to enforce a ruling the court already made.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          They delayed the enforcement of a ruling? I don’t think even they have that power.

                  • Jhex@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    No what I am asking you is what evidence of enforcement do you see anywhere here?

                    Apple was ordered by the courts to do something, they blatantly ignored it and doubled down. At no point it seems the courts were enforcing their initial ruling. It took the defendants to bring this back to court again. What’s stopping Apple from not doing anything and ignoring the courts again?