• 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    So you agree that if it isn’t for sustenance, in the case where you can just simply eat something else, it should be illegal?

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sustenance doesn’t mean “the only thing available”.

      Look, I’m excited for lab-grown meat. I’ve reduced my meat consumption significantly over the last year or two. I may not be “in your camp” exactly, but I’m an ally. And it’s probably better to earn and keep allies than to argue semantics in an adversarial way. Win more flies with honey and all that.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I assume you agree o the general statement “Animals shouldn’t be killed for pleasure.”

        If you then have two options for food, one including animal meat and one without, all other things being equal, even nutrition wise, then how is it not “for pleasure” to chose the option with meat?