Sorry this is kinda political. Is there an asklemmypolitics group this would be better for? I’m hoping not to get into the libs vs progressives political debate we see everywhere on here… Just want to know what people are actually looking for.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s assuming there will even be candidates in the future.

      In previous elections, I would have agreed with you, but Trump has already tried to destroy democracy once. I honestly don’t think that democracy will survive a second Trump term.

      • ForgetPrimacy@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Few of the shitty things Trump was doing have actually stopped under Biden.

        Kids in cages?

        • Was allegedly happening even before Trump and it’s still happening now

        Reproductive Rights?

        • federally gone and state-by-state dissolution continues

        Student loan debt?

        • hah

        Trans rights?

        • sooo many states are making great progress in their initiation of a genocide against trans people

        Edit to add: A point in Biden’s favor was the Inflation Reduction Act which included some teeth to chase tax-dodging billionaires but Biden’s boner for genocide convinced him to remove all those to pass an “aid” package for Israel

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        What if the “democracy” we think we have is actually just oligarchy putting on a show… And the only way to really get a democracy is if we fight for it, and Trump gets the fight going faster so we can get to democracy faster? Just a hypothetical, not advocating for this. Obviously a violent revolution would suck, especially considering the US was literally designed to make peaceful revolution relatively easy, but I think those designs have been crushed at this point… By the oligarchy

        • JoeCoT@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          What if a revolution in the US caused a global economic collapse?

          We tend to think of potential revolutions in the same way as the US Civil War, or the French or Russian revolutions. The problem is that a civil war would be much more like the British Civil War, and most people know very little about the French or Russian revolutions.

          A Revolution or Civil war wouldn’t have 2 times. It’d have a dozen. We can’t agree on what the future of the country should be now, how would we in a Revolution? There would be Revolution, counter-revolution, a civil war where the sides shift every 6 months. And you know how other countries try to influence us now, with Russia interfering with elections and China manipulating companies? That’s with the full strength of the Federal government attempting to stop it. Now they’d get to do it with an extremely vulnerable, fractured country.

          Add on to that that those other revolutions involved world powers, but in a far less connected world wide economy. The fall of the US looks less like the French Revolution, and more like the Bronze Age collapse.

          I think it’s too soon to write off the US as irredeemable without revolution. The last time we had a brush with Fascism taking over the country, we got FDR and The New Deal. If we can avoid this brush with Fascism, we might get another chance at turning things around.

          • Wes4Humanity@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            I feel like Bernie was our shot at a new FDR… And the establishment was able to quash that. I hope we can still do it, but it feels like there’s very little hope for a non violent way to get to actual democracy

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          and Trump gets the fight going faster so we can get to democracy faster?

          How exactly do you think authoritarianism will lead to a collapse, and how will that collapse lead to democracy somehow winning out? Allowing fascists to take over just means we now live in a fascist society. When Germany turned fascist, they didn’t magically break up and become a shining example of democracy. It took serious external pressure for that to happen. Revolutions usually just change the power structure among those who were already in power-- they don’t suddenly grant power to the little guys. Even if, by some miracle, the US went full Nazi and didn’t just stay that way but somehow immediately collapsed, and hundreds of thousands died in a giant civil war and/or WWIII, and we don’t nuke each other off the face of the planet so hard it’s unrecoverable, you expect democracy will be the result? Why? How can you be sure?

          TL;DR: Voting for a fascist won’t cause a collapse and a collapse won’t result in democracy, with any degree of certainty.

          PLEASE actually think these things through instead of just throwing out ideas like this, because if people start to actually believe this we’re going to be in an INCREDIBLY dangerous situation (moreso than we already are!) and the entire world will suffer for it.

    • Matomo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      That sounds like it has to get worse before it can get better. Having trump would create motivation to improve things for getting a better candidate next election, something like that?

      Doesn’t sound like a great option either. It’s not like there’s a ‘good’ option, just a ‘slightly better’ one.

      • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        People have to realize that things can get worse before they decide that it’s time to fix them instead of just treading water

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wrong. What leads to worse and worse candidates is the United States’ stupid ass voting system. That needs to be fixed.

      A step into the right direction would be to not vote for the one party which massively profits from that.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s not how it works in practice. When a candidate wins, they’re established as a benchmark for what’s popular. This means candidates are more likely to be close to their position, but a bit left or right. This is called the “Overton Window” and it establishes what people talk about politically on the national stage.

      When Trump got elected, he started expressing opinions about LGBTQ people, vaccines, etc. Everyone was then forced to argue around those points for 4 years. When Biden was elected, we started talking about unions, corporations, Israel and Palestine, etc. If you take a look at the EU, they’re talking about things like corporate gatekeepers, universal healthcare, and banning Nazi rhetoric.

      By electing people who are progressively more and more to the left of the current democratic candidate, we can shift the Overton Window to begin talking about things like housing, UBI, corporate monopolies, etc. But it’s a gradual process, so we have to be persistent but accepting if it doesn’t all happen immediately.