Your belief contradicts trivially-observable reality - you’re making falsifiable claims that have, in fact, been proven false, and 10 to 15 seconds of internet searching would suffice for anyone, including you, to see that.
Easy example: the parabolic arc of the dust thrown up by the lander tires would have cost more than every penny the USA had at the time to fake.
If they have been proven false, they have been proven false in a way that is questionable. I maintain this conclusion of mine and don’t know how it’s considered bothersome to simply have it without trying to change or influence anyone even if I’ve shared what I think a few times.
That’s said to be offensive because it has to do with a tragedy. I would not see what’s “tragic” about whether there was a moon landing or not to consider it offensive.
Then what, in your view, separates it from having drawn a different conclusion? Is it peddling batshit if someone thinks Roswell happened, or to think Walt Disney was cryogenically frozen, or to go against the grain in the war going on in the East right now?
You’re denying the moon landing happened although the moon landing definitely, demonstrably happened. You’re getting downvoted for peddling batshit.
I second this. Definitely offensive.
What was offensive? What did they say?
Removed by mod
lol
Removed but not lost.
It’s offensive for having a belief?
Your belief contradicts trivially-observable reality - you’re making falsifiable claims that have, in fact, been proven false, and 10 to 15 seconds of internet searching would suffice for anyone, including you, to see that.
Easy example: the parabolic arc of the dust thrown up by the lander tires would have cost more than every penny the USA had at the time to fake.
I thought the most ironclad proof was the retroreflectors we installed there.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon
Those could have just been dropped after the fact. We’ve had plenty of missions to the moon since then.
Unless they think those also didn’t happen of course.
If they have been proven false, they have been proven false in a way that is questionable. I maintain this conclusion of mine and don’t know how it’s considered bothersome to simply have it without trying to change or influence anyone even if I’ve shared what I think a few times.
Lots of beliefs are offensive. For example, Sandy Hook deniers.
That’s said to be offensive because it has to do with a tragedy. I would not see what’s “tragic” about whether there was a moon landing or not to consider it offensive.
Your practising of your belief makes the world a worse place, so… yes.
What was their belief? Asking as their comment says it was removed.
A prerequisite of peddling is wishing to influence others.
That isn’t true. Peddling is independent of the peddler’s motivation/intent.
Then what, in your view, separates it from having drawn a different conclusion? Is it peddling batshit if someone thinks Roswell happened, or to think Walt Disney was cryogenically frozen, or to go against the grain in the war going on in the East right now?
🤡 honk
What did the comment say?
How do clowns relate to anything?