• SuperFola@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    People prefer having something generating shitty code and not checking it, instead of asking or searching on internet for a substantially better solution

    • li10@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because forum posts are always full of accurate and helpful information?

      In my experience it still makes good suggestions for most things, and is better than trying to phrase things in a way that Google likes, then trawling through irrelevant forum posts.

      It’s only there to make suggestions, so if someone is taking its output without understanding and treating it like gospel then they’re an idiot who’s inevitably going to end up in a world of trouble.

      If you take the suggestion, verify it with documentation, then make sure you actually understand it, chatGPT is a great tool.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I’m honest, stackoverflow was always a shortcut for searching documentation to me.

        Simple stuff like how do I turn an InputStream to a String again? I can’t remember it, but I know exactly what to look for, I’m just to lazy.

        For that kind of stuff ChatGPT is almost perfect.

      • Wren@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because forum posts are always full of accurate and helpful information?

        Not necessarily, but at least there’s much more opportunity for other people to jump in and correct false info or expand upon something. It’s by no means a flawless system, but it’s better than only have one source of information

        • new_guy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When we use forums there’s also an opportunity to correct (or be corrected) on how we deal with problems.

          I’ve seen a few times people asking how to do X while they’re actually trying to do Y. ChatGPT would gladly direct them to the wrong path.

      • SuperFola@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t say that people should go on the internet and pick the first forum post either ; that would be like trusting whatever chatgpt is handing you :p

        My point was more on the “people are lazy” side of things, but yeah you have to stay critical of both chatgpt and forum posts.

        • li10@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, I just think that those lazy people will do what they do regardless of where they get their info.

          To butcher a saying; blame the craftsman, not the tools.

          • Aimhere@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I half expect that, if enough programmers use ChatGPT-written code verbatim, someday it’s going to lead to Skynet. I mean, what’s to stop ChatGPT from inserting bits of extra code to be used for its own distributed processing botnet?

      • nous@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sadly there are so many people that take its output as gospel and don’t realise it can be wrong. So is a tool that commonly gets abused by people that don’t know how to use it.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        ChatGPT is a great tool to get you started on stuff. I use it to better formulate my issues in technical terms.

        I just started embedded Linux, so there are a lot of stuff that aren’t intuitive. ChatGPT has been immensely useful to get around cross compiling for embedded linux, and understanding the quirks of the native libraries without having to go back and forth in a forum and not get an answer after a few days

        If you know your stuff already, ChatGPT is not the right tool. If you don’t know where to start, ChatGPT is the best tool ever made because you can clarify and ask for more detail in real time. This is like a personal tutor for free.

    • gosling@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mean shitty code which you can just check and ask them to change in almost real time, over posting your question on SO and waiting for months for an answer?

    • ShortFuse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      People who fail to understand the value of peer-reviewed code are just going to copy/paste bad, but popular, code practices.

      There irony here is that Stackoverflow was considered a common source of copy/pasted code.

    • ofak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chatgpt is still a tool and it’s up to the user how to use it. If you google “bolognese recipe” you get one result; if you Google “traditional ragu from Bologna” you get another. Same for ChatGPT.

    • Aidan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can have it generate shitty code and then compare it against examples it finds online to iterate that code. Also, it was trained on the whole internet, including those good solutions, and can often reproduce them on its own. but you have to tell it, explicitly, to do all this to make better code, rather than just asking for the code.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “I’m sorry, as an AI language model this question has been asked too many times and there is insufficient computer resources to handle your request. You’ve been temporarily silenced for 15 minutes.”

    • EatMyDick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are delusional and will be left behind if that is your view point. The code is usually largely accurate only needing a few tweaks. Easily one of the most powerful scaffolding and learning tool I’ve used in 25 years. Our developers embracing it are more efficient then ever and passing static analysis, owasp scans, coding standards just fine if not better than cranky old devs who think they couldn’t possibly be helped by a dumb machine.

      • SuperFola@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I prefer being delusional and a cranky old dev, rather than trusting AI by giving all of my workplace code and logic. Powerful? Maybe. Helping you ship products faster? I don’t know ; no metrics have been published about that in controlled settings, and I still think people will get lazy and after some time even the ones that tweaked the code and analyzed it thoroughly will just stop caring.

        Go ahead, jump in that bandwagon, and prove me wrong in 5 years. All I want is proof.

        Also, I didn’t know one could be a cranky old dev after a few years of experience only