Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn’t that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense. Talking nonsense solves no problems, as everyone knows, so why is it unjust to deprive you of the right to speak? Quite a few comrades always keep their eyes shut and talk nonsense, and for a Communist that is disgraceful. How can a Communist keep his eyes shut and talk nonsense?
I have to read stuff>? What is this, the mid 20th century? I’ll just wait till the mini-series comes out.
I said was …sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase “the madness of crowds” === which is a true statement
Yes, in western society we often have hundreds of people pushing and shoving to desperately get food. The preferred solution to this is to mow them down with chainguns and RPGs. Happened in Toronto last Tuesday again.
Having not read this comment nor caring to do so: Sometimes people post the first thought that comes to their mind even if it only barely relates to the topic.
I’ll watch the mini-series. I was only speaking of crowds in general, so I didn’t have to read an article about crowds, because I just read a whole book about crowds and the madness that can accompany crowds. don’t tell me what i know. my comment was only on the scope of crowd psychology in human beings. A lot of the commenters are reading into things I said that arent’ there
I said was “Having not read the story”…sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase “the madness of crowds”
No one gains anything from your comment if it’s not informed by the discussion the rest of us are having. Consider just keeping it to yourself next time.
Having not read the story or care to: sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase “the madness of crowds”
There is another phrase I’m fond of, it goes “shut the fuck up you genocide-justifying freak.”
I. NO INVESTIGATION, NO RIGHT TO SPEAK
Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn’t that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense. Talking nonsense solves no problems, as everyone knows, so why is it unjust to deprive you of the right to speak? Quite a few comrades always keep their eyes shut and talk nonsense, and for a Communist that is disgraceful. How can a Communist keep his eyes shut and talk nonsense?
It won’ t do!
It won’t do!
You must investigate!
You must not talk nonsense!
I have to read stuff>? What is this, the mid 20th century? I’ll just wait till the mini-series comes out. I said was …sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase “the madness of crowds” === which is a true statement
Fuck off genocide apologist
Yes, in western society we often have hundreds of people pushing and shoving to desperately get food. The preferred solution to this is to mow them down with chainguns and RPGs. Happened in Toronto last Tuesday again.
yeah it happened in moscow today
I’d engage you further in this battle of wits, but it’s apparent you came unarmed.
go back to reddit’s worldnews where you belong with your fellow nazis
Explain your anger! I said was …sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase “the madness of crowds”. That’s a fact.
Having not read the story: sometimes humans shoot at other humans who they have been trained view as subhuman
maybe I was there for all you know.
Having not read this comment nor caring to do so: Sometimes people post the first thought that comes to their mind even if it only barely relates to the topic.
or, they know more about it than an article can say.
die screaming you Nazi piece of shit
it is simply true. sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase “the madness of crowds”
check out the dancing mania of the 14th-17th centuries
Starting off your post with “Having not read the story” then wildly speculating and referencing some mania from centuries ago makes you look bad.
I. NO INVESTIGATION, NO RIGHT TO SPEAK
If you don’t know what you’re talking about, don’t wildly speculate in a way that gives plausible deniability to Israeli genocide.
I’ll watch the mini-series. I was only speaking of crowds in general, so I didn’t have to read an article about crowds, because I just read a whole book about crowds and the madness that can accompany crowds. don’t tell me what i know. my comment was only on the scope of crowd psychology in human beings. A lot of the commenters are reading into things I said that arent’ there
I said was “Having not read the story”…sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase “the madness of crowds”
You can’t chalk up any violence against a crowd as potentially justified because there’s a saying in your language that says crowds get mad sometimes.
Have you considered not being a bad human being?
no one is good but God - Jesus, Gospel of Luke
Unfortunately I’m not a Christian, so I must reiterate:
Have you considered not being a bad human being?
explain why what I said was …sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase “the madness of crowds” is bad
No one gains anything from your comment if it’s not informed by the discussion the rest of us are having. Consider just keeping it to yourself next time.
someone already told me to die, so that’s what I’ll do. (everyone will eventually)
What do you believe is the rational response to a crowd getting restless?
a new gooey adhesive foam that immobilizes people but allows them to breath?
sometimes. Hence that was the word used.
brother cope harder
what am I coping with. all I said was …sometimes a peaceful crowd will go mad. hence there is a phrase “the madness of crowds”