• tburkhol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    If you’re not sure how the fire works, it seems kind of stupid to build a turbine for it.

    • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      We were absolutely not sure how fire really works (low temperature plasma dynamics and so on) when we used it in caves eons ago.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        We also did not build turbines then.

        Also, a campfire is not plasma, so you probably shouldn’t be building any turbines either.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Very hot flames can contain enough ions / free electrons to be considered a plasma but a wood campfire the likes of which cavemen built, which is what we are discussing here, do not achieve such temperatures. If cavemen wielded acetylene torches then they might have more experience with plasma.

            If you were thinking something simple like “fire is plasma” that is reductive, and the cases where flame is plasma are not the everyday kind. Hence, when I said “a campfire is not plasma” I was being pretty specific. Your reply that ”fire is a low temperature plasma,” as an unqualified blanket statement, is wrong. Go read on it. It’s interesting.

            • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              We used very hot flame later. Still without full understanding of plasma.