• SoJB@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s also an argument to be made for the pixels not being an ideal multiple. Maybe it matters less when there are 3440x1440 of them on a traditional screen, but the blurriness caused by this effect at small screen sizes is quite noticeable on text.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        i think screens look blurry in the wrong resolution. i always rather use it in the native resolution. that effect will probably be more noticeable in a low ppi screen like the deck’s.

    • morgan423@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Or at 720p, as this is a 16:9 aspect ratio, and running stuff on it at 16:10 will look weird.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        FSR2/XeSS upscaling pretty much acts as free anti aliasing, making it look better. And you get better UI rendering.

        • yonder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I personally find the sharpened look of FSR to look really bad to the point where I prefer conventional bilinear upscaling, not to mention that using FSR also uses precious compute time on weaker systems.