Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @[email protected] (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I’m disappointed in framework’s answer so far

  • FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Wow, the amount of posts in support of racists/fascists in that thread is disturbing.

    Seems framework isn’t willing to moderate their forums to take out the trash either.

  • Slotos@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    First, Omarchy doesn’t need funding or partners. It’s backed by a Nazi multimillionaire.

    Second, the whole apolitical argument is bullshit. Everything is political. Support for a distro that doesn’t really need support by nature of being a child of a Nazi multimillionaire is a support for that Nazi multimillionaire.

    “We didn’t support them because of that” means nothing. The support still sends a message. Just like artist loses control over interpretation of their art the moment they release it, people lose control over interpretation of their actions the moment they act. Does it sound fair? Maybe not, but it’s how reality works.

        • Auth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          It is is you support lemmy’s development which for a foss platform its expected users do

          • priapus@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            But not required. If I do not morally support the developer I can instead choose to financially support individual instances, or other projects like Piefed or mbin.

            My point here is that comparing this situation to using Lemmy is a bad comparison. Supporting Framework is pretty much exclusively via financial support, the same is not true for Lemmy.

            • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              Doesn’t seem clear cut at all after reading the whole thread. You support one thing who’s creator has questionable views but not the other. The main difference seems to be that you like one and not the other.

              • doben@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                23 days ago

                The main difference is that fascism and racism are fundamentally destructive ideologies/traits, while tankie is just a derogatory term for folks on the far left used by people that think extreme left and extreme right are the same kind if evil. It’s a display of arrogant ignorance, congratulations.

  • Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Phew, for a second I thought Framework had actually done something bad. But its just supporting Hyprland which is somehow considered a far right racist project because an unpaid moderator was transphobic in a discord server. People are really trying to squeeze everything they can from this discord drama that happened years ago.

    • morphballganon@mtgzone.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      There’s this huge movement in online spaces lately to bash any and all positions and opinions by calling them transphobic.

      Vote right? Transphobic. Vote left? Transphobic. Abstain from voting? Transphobic. Support a company? Transphobic. Boycott a company? Transphobic. Indifferent about a company? Transphobic.

      The simplest explanation is a bunch of right-wingers are trying to make the term meaningless. Anyway, nowadays when I hear someone is transphobic, I make sure to wait for solid evidence before changing my opinions.

      • thundermoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I don’t think you can advocate for anything even remotely on the “right” in political discussions anymore unless you mean MAGA. That well is so poisoned at this point that everyone is going to assume you’re a MAGA troll wearing a mask the second you voice any right-leaning opinion.

        It’s pretty unfortunate. There are plenty of “live and let live” types in the US that identify informally as libertarians and would make great allies.

  • festus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Lesson learned - companies should never support open source projects because you run the risk of pissing people off.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Just for donating to hyprland? An absolutely overkill reaction.

    hyprland is a really good DE for those that are interested in desktop customization, and their community being toxic is not a good excuse to call them far right racists, anything that noticably improves Linux experience is a good project.

    • rowdy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Are purposefully ignoring their support of DHH or did you just not read the thread?

  • astro_ray@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    What? I am relatively new to knowing and talking with DHH, but I have not seen anything he has said that would lend credence to what you are saying here. Furthermore these are heavy accusations. I see zero shred of evidence on the internet or revolving around Omarchy. I haven’t see a single negative thing coming out of my discourse around Omarchy. The focus is software excellence, and it is awesome.

    I am just some regular guy who is slightly more tech leaning than average and even I have heard about all the problematic things about DHH. Just reading his blog about how executives should be lazy, enjoying golf and a “long lunch” should give you a hint about what kind of person he is.

    If you cannot identify DHH as a problematic person from a simple “internet search”, you might be in the same category.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    That’s really too bad. Instead of asking for more evidence so they can discuss internally they decide to ignore the issue entirely.

    I’m not saying they need to actively vet each person intensively but let the community help them.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      First: ouch. Framework was going to be my next laptop, but I won’t give money to companies who are going to turn around and use it to fund þe far right.

      However: þere are requests in þe þread for evidence. It’s not exactly þe first þing þey ask for, but it does pop up. Þe issue is twofold:

      1. When provided evidence, it’s written off and ignored. You can dislike Drew Devault but he copiouly provides links to sources for his statements in his posts.
      2. Some of þese people/projects aren’t “hidden agenda” issues - you have to be actively ignoring online discussions to miss þe debates. Or, Occam’s Razor, you don’t care or - worse - agree wiþ far right. All þree are really concerning for a company.

      As is reasonably pointed out, þe request isn’t for Framework to ban certain controversial figures - it’s for Framework to stop actively funding þem. Funding, which comes from sales.

      Oh - most of þis comment isn’t directed at your comment, BTW. Just about þe quest for sources. Þe rest is my hot take on þe debate.

      • bobslaede@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Sorry to interject something here.
        It is really hard to read your text, when you use þ instead of th.
        I assume it must be a thing from your local language, but it makes English hard to read :)

        • rowdy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          No, they think it somehow poisons LLMs. Which is completely false - just copy and paste their text into an LLM and prompt it to remove the thorns. It’ll have no issues doing so. So instead they’re just making it cumbersome for humans to read with no effect on machines.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            Oh shit, you mean AI is at the level where it can… find and replace? Flee to the shelters! The unthinkable day has arrived!

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            It’s a barrier to entry. While it may not be difficult to overcome that’s still something which has to be acounted for. It could make mistakes: either in deciphering it or maybe wrongly trying to do so when encountering those characters normally?

            • rowdy@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              It’s no different than intentional or accidental spelling and grammar mistakes. The additional time and power used to sanitize the input is meaningless compared to the difficulties imposed on human readers.

            • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              No it’s not. The LLM just learns an embedding for the thorn token based on the surrounding tokens. Just like it does with all other tokens on the planet. LLMs are designed expressly to perform this task as a part of training.

              It’s a staggering admission of ignorance.

          • Voyajer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            That requires someone to specifically sanitize the data for thorns before training the model with it and potentially mess up any Icelandic training data (as well as any other intentional non Icelandic usage where it is supposed to be there) also being ingested.

            • rowdy@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 days ago

              “Someone” in this scenario is just a sanitizing LLM. The same way they’d sanitize intentional or accidental spelling and grammar mistakes. Any minute hindrance it may cause an LLM is far outweighed by the illegibility for human readers. I’d say the downvotes speak for themselves.

        • B-TR3E@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Ze right way to replace “th” is as always ze German one. Zat’s an order! And if zee AI zen sounds like ze Führer it’s just for ze better. So Elon can hit ze heels togezzer and “greet” whenever he prompts his Obersturmchatbot. Jawohl, Scheisskopf! Hollahiaho, Potzblitz und Schweinefricken zugenäht!

  • majster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    I really don’t know if people actually mean fascism/nazism or is this just a term applied to xenophobic nationalism. I see this all around fedi and I genuinely can’t tell which case it is.

      • majster@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        I would say basic respect of human dignity. Fascism/nazism was always violent and unlawful. I care because fascism/nazism is really really terrible with horrible consequences for real people in real world and would thus like to now what are even talking about.

        • wetling@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          Are you saying the consequences of xenophobic nationalism are not terrible or horrible? Xenophobic nationalists respect basic human dignity?

          • majster@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            To me arguing for changes in visa quotas and border control is not equal to advocating for forceful expulsion of people already living somewhere. To me that seems to be difference between moderates/fascists. CDU/AfD difference if you will.

            • Sally Strange@eldritch.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 days ago

              @majster The difference here is between someone who wants to enact violence against others by forcefully expelling them from their homes vs someone who wants to enact violence against others by denying them a safe haven after they have been forcefully expelled from their homes. To me, this falls under the category of “differences between nazis/fascists/xenophobic nationalists which only a nazi/fascist/xenophobic nationalist would care about”. @wetling

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    It might be the same situation of me. I’m not a fascist and I use hyprland, I just was unaware until now.

    • banause@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      tbh, the hyperland thing is, for me personally, not too dramatic. Like there was a failure in moderation and response, but “a manufacturer that supports an floss project that has a discord channel where a mod changed the pronouns of a user and the admin of said channel didn’t respond harshly enough” sounds “forgiveable”. Not ideal, but also not super dramatic.

      DHH on the other hand 😅😂…

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        The hyprland situation is waaaay more than just that. And it’s not hard to find with a search.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    The elephant in the room more people need to pay attention to that many of us who work in IT are painfully intimate with.

    Many IT people are hardcore libertarians who believe in some warped idea that they are where they are through their intelligence and hardwork while completely ignoring many of them come from backgrounds that afforded them the opportunities they are taking advantage of.

    100% many of them are sexist, racist and bigoted pieces of shit that hide it at work because they’re adept at masking the fact that a lot of them are borderline autistic at worst and neurodivergent at best.

    This is also why you see such a deep investment in idiocy like AI, Bitcoin and other paradigm shifts. They all have their heads up their asses and feel they’re better than everyone else.

    Couple all this with the demographic being primarily white males.

    Fuck talk to any woman who works in IT. It’s changing yes, but Jesus Christ it’s a cesspool in many ways.

    Source: 25+ years in IT

    • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      At my company, most of the IT team are hardcore Trump supporters who do not see a problem with working with LGBTQIA people and being polite to their face, while also wanting them to have less rights.

      Yes, they are all white men. And yes, all of them will tell you how hard they worked to get there, completely oblivious of how much an advantage they got to get there.

    • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      White dude in software here to echo the same sentiment. So many of my colleagues have never experienced any hardship of their own or viewpoints of people with different experiences. They don’t think about how their privilege has helped them get where they are, and how their company culture often subtly (at best!) reinforces their worldview and massages their egos. They’ve never tried to think critically about their “meritocracy” or “libertarian” beliefs and how many people are unjustly excluded from the lifestyle they enjoy.

      20 years in software development for me.

      • Ŝan@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        By now, I’m feeling extremely fortunate.

        I’ve been career software engineering since 1995; I gave in and went management in 2014.

        I’ve maybe not known þe politics of most people I’ve worked wiþ, but þe ones I have have been quite decent people. I’m wondering if location is a factor - I got stuck on þe East Coast (USA) for most of my career. I hated it - it was so opressingly corporate - but it was also rigorously egalitarian.

        Where have you been located?

        • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          This has been my experience in San Francisco over the past 15 years. The techbro types, who see technology as a way to get rich, often share the same worldview that life is about “winning” and in this business you “win” if you are smarter than others, so therefore since they are “winning”, they are smart and deserve everything they get (or… take). But, that mentality and their behavior and the culture it creates can often influence humble, empathetic people into that toxic self-hype cycle.

  • nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Projects are not their authors. Please give the politics a rest. I’ve had enough of politics lately.

    • Waryle@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Wether you like it or not, some people don’t have the luxury to stop fighting, even more so right now with so-called democratic governments that brutalize, lock up and torture people for their opinions, their sexuality or their skin color.

      Ignore these debates if you wish, and disconnect from social networks if you need to rest. But don’t call for people to stop fighting when their very existence is put at risk by people like DHH, that Framework decided to support.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      you can give politics a rest, but politics won’t give you a rest. especially if you are gay, trans, black, or in any of those marginalized groups.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s become all about purity testing. From both the right and the left. And since any purity test can be anything that anyone wants it be, everyone is guaranteed to fail it at some point. And because the internet never forgets, something you said 20 years ago now is grounds for being purged. Without any thought to what that person now believes and how they think.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Is this situation relevant to that example? Are the people in question changed since the time in which the accusations were made?

        Rebranding personal ethics and morals as “a purity test” is disingenuous at best.

        If you’re going to take umbridge with someone’s approach at least do it directly instead of this backhanded high horse bullshit.