- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
I guess everyone in the UK knows what “EE” is, but I have no idea.
EE (formerly Everything Everywhere) is a British mobile network operator, internet service provider and a brand of BT Consumer, a division of BT Group. Supposedly the #1 network in the UK similar to Verizon in the US.
Oh. I figured it was some government body.
deleted by creator
It is thought to be the the first time a UK mobile operator has offered such advice.
I reread the article but missed it the first time. It is a UK mobile operator. Reading it without an intro on the subject was frustrating.
Elon’s Enemies
This is odd advice, when you consider many kids in the same age group probably have access to (or own) a tablet device of some sort. The only difference with a smartphone is the ability to call and text, and portability while staying connected (assuming many tablets aren’t 4G/5G capable).
Or am I missing something here?
A tablet is a device you give your child to use for a limited time, ideally supervised.
A phone is a device they carry around all day and also use while you’re not there.
I won’t give my child a tablet before they’re 11 either. I’d rather give them a desktop PC and a drawing tablet.
But a phone is now pretty much necessary starting with secondary school, unless you want your child to be bullied and socially isolated.Well, at least where I live, phones are banned in schools. So that’s a good start.
I heard a podcast with the author of this book and the conclusion was similar. He recommends no smartphone before 16. Dumb phones for simple communication can be whenever.
I haven’t read the book yet, but the podcast discussion was fairly informative. I think it was Hidden Brain’s Escaping the Matrix episode.
hopefully no one is dumb enough to oppose this advice, publicly at least.
Sounds reasonable enough. I think in most of Europe that’s about when kids finish elementary school.
